Parales

(PC) Bennett v. Parales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20251:24-cv-00591California4,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO BENNETT, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00591-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. STATE A CLAIM PALARES, et al., (ECF No. 23.) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Mario Bennett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a complaint and then filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Before the Court could screen the first amended complaint, Plaintiff lodged a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 16.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file the second amended complaint and then screened the second amended complaint. Following screening, Plaintiff was granted leave to file a third amended complaint, which is now before the Court for screening. (ECF NO. 23.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.