Alvarez

Alvarez v. Morris Shea Bridge Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20251:24-cv-01487California966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SERGIO ALVAREZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-01487-KES-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION AS

v. DUPLICATIVE MORRIS SHEA BRIDGE COMPANY, (Doc. 1) Defendant. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 16 Plaintiff Sergio Alvarez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action on December 6, 2024. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. Screening Requirement The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). II. Discussion Plaintiff asserts a claim for fraud…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.