United States v. $141,684.62 in Bank Funds

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20252:24-cv-03647California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:24-cv-03647-CAS-PVCx

Plaintiff,

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

v.

$141,684.62 IN BANK FUNDS,

Defendant.

16 On May, 2024, the government filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture as to the defendant, 141,684.62 in Bank Funds (“defendant bank funds”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(A) and (C) and 984. A Default by Clerk was entered on December 4, 2024, against the interests of Selead Global Trade Inc and Zaihua Li, victims R.M. of Virginia, A.E., R.E., J.B., M.N., M.S., R.M. of Arizona, K.B., S.B., S.L., J.S., E.C., R.J., S.W., Y.C., N.J., M.T., W.T., R.K., H.R., M.M., M.P, H.W., P.G., J.D., H.M., C.K., M.L., X.Y., C.R., P.W., C.W., J.J., N.T., W.W., and R.P., and all other potential claimants. “Granting or denying a motion for default judgment is a matter within the court’s discretion.” Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. Parth Circuit has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.