Ramirez

Ramirez v. Investcorp Holdings CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 2025E081603California1,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/6/25 Ramirez v. Investcorp Holdings CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARTIN RAMIREZ,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E081603

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1904895)

INVESTCORP HOLDINGS, B.S.C. et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Winston S. Keh,

Judge. Affirmed.

Martin Ramirez, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Tressler and Jeffrey Michael Carson for Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff and appellant Martin Ramirez files this second appeal in regard to a

complaint filed in 2019 in which he claimed to have fallen and sustained injuries at his

apartment complex,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.