People v. McCoy CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified two possible issues that were considered in evaluating to potential merits of this appeal. 1. Whether McCoy is entitled to additional custody credits for the jail sentence, which was ordered, even though she was released early by federal order.

2 2. Whether McCoy’s conduct credits were properly limited pursuant to section 2933.1 due to her concurrent sentence involving a violent felony. We have independently reviewed the record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented McCoy on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

IRION, J.

DO, J.

3