Shin

Shin v. Umeken USA Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202524-2848California621 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIN SOOK SHIN, Individually and On No. 24-2848 Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, D.C. No. 8:17-cv-00315-CJC-SS Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

UMEKEN USA INC; BRIAN

HAN; DOES, 1 through 10,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Min Sook Shin (“Shin”) appeals the district court’s

denial of her motion to reopen her case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 60(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Shin filed this putative class action in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.