Comprehensive Medical Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202523-3308California1,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL CENTER, No. 23-3308 INC., D.C. No. 2:17-cv-07672-JAK-JPR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

After water leaks damaged the office of Comprehensive Medical Center,

Inc. (“CMC”), CMC’s insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“State Farm”), paid $164,500 for income lost due to the leaks. CMC sued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.