Beinlick

Beinlick v. Pace

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202523-2479California819 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN BEINLICK, No. 23-2479 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:17-cv-00824-WBS-DMC v.

MEMORANDUM*

ADAM PACE, M.D., Mule Creek State Prison; DAVID SMILEY, Chief Medical Officer, Mule Creek State Prison; C. SMITH, Chief Physicial and Surgeon, Mule Creek State Prison; OLIVER LAU, Chief Medical Officer, Mule Creek State Prison; A. PFILE; O. LAU; D. SMILEY; A.

C. PACE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Brian Beinlick (“Beinlick”), a California state prisoner, sued David…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.