Pruitt

(PC) Malcolm Stroud v. Pruitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20251:17-cv-01659California4,189 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MALCOLM TANDY LAMON STROUD, Case No. 1:17-cv-01659-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND FOR

v. TELECONFERENCE (ECF No. 61) PRUITT, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

Defendants. GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

TERMINATING SANCTIONS

(ECF No. 62)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Malcolm Tandy Lamon Stroud, aka Treasure Stroud, (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Pruitt for sexual abuse in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Pruitt and Smith for discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.