Stanz

Stanz v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20253:22-cv-01164California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON STANZ, individually and Case No. 3:22-CV-01164-GPC-JLB derivatively on behalf of Jet Genius 12 Holdings, Inc., ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL AND Plaintiff,

DENYING MOTION TO

14 v. DISQUALIFY COUNSEL AS MOOT 15 JORDAN BROWN et al., [ECF Nos. 179, 171] 16 and

JET GENIUS HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants. 20 On December 12, 2024, Higgs Fletcher & Mack, LLP and all attorneys associated with it including Nicholas D. Brauns and Edwin M. Boniske (“Movant”) filed an ex parte motion to withdraw from representation of Defendants Jordan Brown, Jet Genius Holdings, Inc., Jet Genius Florida Holdings, Inc., C3 Jets LLC, C3 Limo LLC, Jet Agency Global, LLC, and Bowman Aviation, Inc. (“Defendants”) and to substitute Defendant Jordan Brown pro se. ECF No. 179 (“Mot.”). For the reasons set forth below, 27 the Court GRANTS the motion to withdraw and ORDERS that corporate Defendants obtain new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.