Foundation Auto Holdings, LLC v. Weber Motors, Fresno, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20251:21-cv-00970California5,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

6 A. The Court’s Order 7 On October 29, 2024, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s motion to compel in full, “except 8 insofar as Defendants ha[d] not waived objections based on attorney client privilege or work 9 product regarding any documents filed since the commencement of this action on June 18, 2021.” 10 (ECF No. 101 at 4). The Defendants were ordered that “[b]y no later than thirty (30) days from 11 the date of [the] order, [they] must produce: (1) the requested documents, and (2) a privilege log, 12 if any, reflecting privileged document post-dating the commencement of this action on June 18, 13 2021.” (Id.). Plaintiff was ordered to “file a statement identifying reasonable expenses, including 14 attorney fees, that they incurred in filing the motion to compel” no later than November 7, 2024. 15 (Id.). It was also notified that “[the] statement should not include fees and costs related to Rule 30(b)(6) depositions or meet and confer efforts, such as discussions leading to the stipulation at ECF No. 81, but it may include fees and costs related to the October 24, 2024, hearing.” (Id.). Defendants were told that they may “file any objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.