Beyard

Beyard v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20251:21-cv-01063California4,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Denise Beyard, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01063-KJM-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Pentagon Federal Credit Union, the defendant in this proposed class action, moves to 18 dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue. The court denies the motion in both respects. As explained in this order, there is a live case or controversy, a substantial part 20 of the disputed transactions occurred within this District, and a single action in this district will serve the interests of justice and avoid unnecessary delays and confusion. 22 I. MOOTNESS Panghnia Vue filed this case in 2021. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. She alleged the 24 credit union, on two separate occasions, had wrongly charged her a duplicative $30 fee for withdrawals exceeding her account balance. See id. J 14-18. She also alleged the credit union 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.