Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAMELA HILL, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00336-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS AND STRIKE

PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED

PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, et COMPLAINT al., Re: Dkt. No. 76 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs allege Defendants failed to provide them sick pay and leave and retaliated against a subset of them in violation of California state and municipal laws. (Dkt. No. 88.) Certain Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and move to strike portions of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). (Dkt. No. 76.) Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing and with the benefit of oral argument on February 6, 2025, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss and DENIES the motion to strike. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Plaintiffs are 16 current…