Michael Walker v. Capitol North American, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20255:24-cv-01743California219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 24-1743-KK-SPx Date: February 6, 2025 Title:

Present: The Honorable KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Noe Ponce Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re: Federal Court Jurisdiction

The Court is in receipt of plaintiff Michael Walker’s request to remand. Dkt. 22. Plaintiff states he filed an amended complaint in state court on October 7, 2024, to “reduce the amount demanded to $10,000.” Id. As Plaintiff correctly states, this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to the Carmack Amendment requires, inter alia, the amount in controversy to exceed $10,000. Steiner v. Horizon Moving Sys. Inc., 568 F. Supp. 2d 1084, 1086 (C.D. Cal. 2008) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1337).

Accordingly, Defendants are to file a written response no later than seven days from today’s date as to why this Court maintains jurisdiction. Failure to comply will result…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.