Macomber

(HC) See v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20251:24-cv-01096California3,515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOUSENG SEE, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-01096-KES-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO ) GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. ) [Doc. 13] JEFF MACOMBER, ) ) [21-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD] Respondent. ) ) )

17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed his petition in this Court on September 12, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On November 18, 2024, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss contending that the petition is unexhausted, violates the statute of limitations, and fails to state a claim. (Doc. 13.) On January 21, 2025, Petitioner filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Doc. 16.) Respondent filed a reply on February 4, 2025. (Doc. 17.) Upon review of the pleadings, the Court finds that the petition is unexhausted, violates the statute 25 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.