Aramark

(PC) Cuellar v. Aramark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20251:24-cv-01196California1,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, No. 1:24-cv-01196-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST TO ADD ADDITIONAL CAUSES

v. OF ACTION AND DEFENDANTS TO FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

ARAMARK, et al., (ECF No. 18) Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY

DAYS TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 4, 2024. On November 26, 2024, the Court screening Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) On January 6, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) Then, on January 27, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for a copy of the Court’s November 26, 2024, screening order and advised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.