Vanessa West v. Rheem Manufacturing Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20252:24-cv-09686California7,930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 8, 2024, plaintiff Vanessa West (“West” or “plaintiff’) filed this action individually and on behalf of a purported class against defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company (“Rheem”) and defendant Melet Plastics, Inc. (“Melet”). Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff asserts ten claims for relief: (1) breach of express warranty; (2) breach of the implied warranty of merchantability; (3) violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301: (4) strict liability for the alleged manufacturing defect, design defect, and failure to warn; (5) negligence; (6) negligent failure to warn: (7) common law fraud; (8) violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Cal. Civil Code §1792; (9) violations of the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200; and (10) unjust enrichment. Compl. §{ 78-176. She seeks damages, attorneys’ fees, and equitable and injunctive relief enjoining defendants from continuing to pursue these practices. Id. at 42-43 J 2-7. On January 6, 2025, defendant Rheem filed the instant motion to dismiss. Dkt. 26 (“Mot.”). On January 13, 2025, plaintiff filed an opposition. Dkt. 30 (“Opp.”). On January…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.