(PS) James v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20252:18-cv-00180California2,999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL JAMES, et al., No. 2:18-cv-0180 DAD-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for discovery-related sanctions (“Sanctions Motion,” ECF No. 81) and a motion to compel production of documents and videos (“Motion to Compel,” ECF No. 82). The Sanctions Motion seeks $5,000 in sanctions for Defendants’ alleged failure to produce all documents required under the court’s October 18, 2024 order. ECF Nos. 78, 81. The Motion to Compel seeks an order requiring disclosure of additional video camera footage related to Plaintiff’s arrests, unredacted versions of documents already produced in this litigation, and all grievances and “kites” Plaintiff submitted while jailed by Defendants. ECF No. 82. Defendants oppose both motions. The Court took both motions under submission after a hearing on January 23, 2025 in which Plaintiff appeared…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.