Lingle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Anthony Lingle, No. 2:22-cev-01471-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Centimark Corporation, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Anthony Lingle has renewed his motion seeking the court’s preliminary approval 18 of the parties’ agreement to settle this proposed class action. The court grants the motion, as 19 explained below. 20 I. BACKGROUND Lingle alleges Centimark, his former employer, violated the California Labor Code and 22 the state’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) by withholding wages from him and other employees, by misreporting wages on pay stubs and by depriving employees of the full rest and 24 meal breaks required by law, among other similar claims. See Order (Apr. 17, 2023) at 1-2, 5— 14, ECF No. 37. Lingle is pursuing his Labor Code claims on behalf of a proposed class, while his PAGA claims are, by nature, representative. See id. at 2. The…