Darby

(PS) Burton v. Darby

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20252:23-cv-03034California404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STANLEY BURTON, No. 2:23-cv-3034 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LAILA DARBY, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Plaintiff filed this case against the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (“SHRA”) and two individual defendants, Laila Darby and Ibra Henley. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff and defendant SHRA appeared before the court on February 5, 2025, for a scheduling conference. In SHRA’s scheduling report, it notified the court and plaintiff that the individual defendants were no longer employed by SHRA and that SHRA could not, and did not, accept service on their behalf. ECF No. 30. Plaintiff provided only SHRA’s address for the individual defendants and accordingly, defendants Darby and Henley have not been served. The undersigned discussed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.