(PC) Gray v. Home Depot Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20252:24-cv-02108California2,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEE GRAY, No. 2:24-cv-02108 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

HOME DEPOT COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2, 8), plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1), and plaintiff’s motions to appoint counsel (ECF Nos. 9, 10). Plaintiff has submitted the required declaration and certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the requests to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. The court, however, finds plaintiff fails to state any claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and recommends this case be dismissed without leave to amend. The court further finds that plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.