Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-3070California943 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GAGANDEEP SINGH, No. 23-3070 Agency No. Petitioner, A215-674-305 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Gagandeep Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming denial by an immigration

judge (“IJ”) of Singh’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Singh, a Sikh man,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** We granted the parties’ joint motion to submit this case on the briefs, without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleges that he was physically attacked and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.