Romero-Amaya

Romero-Amaya v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1090California859 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISRAEL ROMERO-AMAYA, No. 23-1090 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-536-644 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Israel Romero-Amaya, a native and citizen of El Salvador, seeks review of a

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

The sole issue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.