Portillo

Portillo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1699California1,003 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS PORTILLO, No. 23-1699 Agency No. Petitioner, A088-711-176 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Luis Portillo, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of a Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the denial by

an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

We review the BIA’s denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.