Bondi

Pineda Garcia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1170California710 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATEO PINEDA GARCIA, No. 23-1170 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-716-501 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Mateo Pineda Garcia (“Pineda”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to

remand and dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his

claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (“CAT”). We review the BIA’s denial of asylum, withholding of

removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.