Bondi
Maldonado Gomez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-3363California871 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREA CELESTE MALDONADO No. 23-3363 GOMEZ; LIZBETH ARIANA ROLDAN Agency Nos.
MALDONADO, A220-134-668
A220-134-669
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Andrea Celeste Maldonado-Gomez (“Maldonado”) and her daughter seek
review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 We…