Bondi

Maldonado Gomez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-3363California871 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA CELESTE MALDONADO No. 23-3363 GOMEZ; LIZBETH ARIANA ROLDAN Agency Nos.

MALDONADO, A220-134-668

A220-134-669

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Andrea Celeste Maldonado-Gomez (“Maldonado”) and her daughter seek

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.