Kumar
Kumar v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-174California1,260 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMIT MISHRA KUMAR, No. 23-174 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-266-072 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 3, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Amit Mishra Kumar petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of
his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention
Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the petition.