Kumar

Kumar v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-174California1,260 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMIT MISHRA KUMAR, No. 23-174 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-266-072 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Amit Mishra Kumar petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of

his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the petition.

Where the BIA provides its own reasoning, as it did here, “we review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.