Bondi

Hernandez-Hernandez De Guzman v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1464California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SINTIA MURIEL HERNANDEZ- No. 23-1464 HERNANDEZ DE GUZMAN, Agency No.

A201-688-834

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Sintia Muriel Hernandez-Hernandez de Guzman, a native and citizen of

Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision

dismissing her appeal of an immigration judge’s order denying her applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.