Gomez-Ortuno

Gomez-Ortuno v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202522-2031California875 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YARELY GOMEZ-ORTUNO; ALEXIS No. 22-2031 JAIMES-GOMEZ; EULICES JAIMES- Agency Nos.

GOMEZ, A208-604-427

A208-604-429

Petitioners,

A208-604-428

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Yarely Gomez-Ortuno and her two minor children (collectively, “petitioners”)

petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying

their untimely and number-barred second motion to reopen. The BIA denied their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion because petitioners forfeited their objection to the defective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.