Bondi

Garduno Gonzalez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1056California716 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE DE JESUS GARDUNO No. 23-1056 GONZALEZ, Agency No.

A208-818-173

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Felipe de Jesus Garduno Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), a native and citizen of

Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision

affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.