Bondi

De Paz-Machado v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-2549California653 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

FEB 7 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMA MARICELA DE PAZ- No. 23-2549 MACHADO; ALVARO ALEXI Agency Nos.

BERDOMO-DE PAZ; JUSTIN ESAU A206-880-185

BERDOMO-DE PAZ, A206-880-186

A206-880-187

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Norma Maricela De Paz-Machado and her two sons (derivative

beneficiaries pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(3)), natives and citizens of El

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Salvador, seek review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.