Bondi

Cerritos Duran v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1525California424 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS CERRITOS DURAN, No. 23-1525 Agency No. Petitioner, A076-352-619 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Juan Carlos Cerritos Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his motion to

reopen and terminate his removal proceedings. Cerritos Duran invokes our

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismiss the petition.

Cerritos Duran challenges only the Board’s decision not to reopen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.