Bondi

Arellano Soto v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-1517California494 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULINA ARELLANO SOTO, No. 23-1517 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-817-128 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Paulina Arellano Soto, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying her motion to remand and

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying her application

for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the petition.

In her opening brief, Arellano Soto noted that the Supreme Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.