Aguirre-Aguirre

Aguirre-Aguirre v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-3005California359 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONATO AGUIRRE-AGUIRRE, No. 23-3005 Agency No. Petitioner, A027-731-787 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Ramon Martinez Garcia 1 (“Martinez”) petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings

based on new evidence after the BIA dismissed his appeal from an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Donato Aguirre-Aguirre is a name that Martinez previously used. We use Martinez’s legal name. judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for adjustment of status and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.