Urbina

Urbina v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 7, 202523-4078California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ROSIBEL URBINA, No. 23-4078 Agency No. Petitioner, A220-939-717 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Maria Rosibel Urbina, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal

of an order from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”). The IJ denied her applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”).

Urbina asserts that the BIA erred in holding that she waived any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.