People v. Gonzales CA4/1

statement of facts.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and requests the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified a possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the court erred in denying Gonzales’s request to modify the criminal protective order. We have reviewed the record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Gonzales on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

DO, J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3