Cotchett

Cotchett v. Romano CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2025A169927California4,233 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 2/7/25 Cotchett v. Romano CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RACHAEL COTCHETT,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A169927

v. DONNA ROMANO, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCV273177) Defendant and Appellant.

Rachael Cotchett filed the instant action against Donna Romano alleging Romano wrongfully repudiated the parties’ agreement permitting Cotchett to operate a flower farming and retail business on Romano’s land as a joint venture of the parties. Romano filed a special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP law (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16, et seq.), arguing Cotchett’s claims arise from Romano’s protected conduct of serving a 30-day notice to quit on Cotchett and prosecuting an unlawful detainer action to remove Cotchett from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.