People v. Newman CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2025F087828California4,110 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

INTRODUCTION

In 2011, appellant James Andrew Newman was convicted by jury of four counts of first degree robbery (Pen. Code,1 § 211, counts 1-4), one count of false imprisonment (§ 236, count 5), and one count of receipt of stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a), count 6). With respect to counts 1 through 4, the jury found true a firearm use enhancement allegation (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)). Following a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found that Newman had suffered prior convictions under the Three Strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (c)-(j), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(e)) and had served prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced Newman to an indeterminate prison term of 25 years to life, plus a determinate term of 12 years. In 2020, Senate Bill No. 136 (2019-2020 Reg. Sess.) (SB 136) amended section 667.5, restricting the application of prior prison term enhancements except where a prior conviction is for a sexually violent offense. (Stats 2019, ch. 590, § 3.) Effective January 1, 2022, Senate Bill No. 483 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (SB 483) added former section 1172.1, now section 1172.75 to the Penal Code. (Stats. 2021, ch. 728.) Section 1172.75 made SB 136’s changes to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.