Canoo Technologies, Inc. v. Harbinger Motors, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20252:22-cv-09309California771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANOO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No. 2:22-cv-09309-FLA (JCx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS

ACTION FOR LACK OF

STANDING HARBINGER MOTORS, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 18 On December 22, 2022, Plaintiff Canoo Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit against Defendants Harbinger Motors, Inc., Alexi Charbonneau, Benjamin Dusastre, William Eberts, Michael Fielkow, John Henry Harris, Phillip Weicker, Bharat Forge Limited, and Tiger Global Management, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), along with other former Defendants that have been dismissed from the action. Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”). In the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), filed March 24, 2023, Plaintiff alleges it is an electric automotive company that develops technology in the electric vehicle market, “including technology related to its independent platform called the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.