Schmidt
Schmidt v. Pfizer Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
WAoe WILYL INU, OLEaU VOCUTTICHIL FHEO UciUfiZo rage 1 Olo
CERTIFIED A TRUE COPY
Jessica J. Lyublanovits, Clerk of Cot UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEby: Deounes apy LA on Deputy Cle
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: DEPO-PROVERA
(DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3140
TRANSFER ORDER
Before the Panel:* Two groups of plaintiffs! have filed motions under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of California or the Central District of California. This litigation consists of 27 actions pending in eight districts, as listed on Schedule A.” In addition, the parties have informed the Panel of related actions pending in fifteen districts.? All responding plaintiffs support centralization. Most of these plaintiffs either support or do not oppose centralization in the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs in four of these actions (all pending in the Southern District of Indiana) condition their non-opposition to a Northern District of California transferee forum on discovery and depositions of plaintiffs taking place in…