Taylor

(HC) Blanc v. Taylor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20251:24-cv-01212California1,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LUKNER BLANC, Case No. 1:24-cv-01212-CDB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v. (Doc. 12) T. TAYLOR, Respondent. 7-Day Deadline 16 17 Petitioner Lukner Banc (“Petitioner”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). On October 8, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition while in custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at Federal Correctional Institution, Mendota (“FCI Mendota”), in Mendota, California. (Id.). Petitioner is currently in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons at FCI Mendota. (Id.). On October 11, 2024, the Court issued an order directing respondent to file a response to the petition within 60 days of the date of service of the order. (Doc. 5). On December 5, 2024, the Court was informed that the filings in this matter inadvertently were not served on or otherwise provided to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.