Doerer

(PC) Justus v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20251:25-cv-00138California1,659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT JUSTUS, No. 1:25-cv-00138-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

J.DOERER, et al., (ECF No. 1) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v.Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on February 3, 2025. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief against a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.