(HC) Craig v. Black

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Norman John Craig, No. 2:22-cv-0200 KJM AC P Petitioner, ORDER v. Cindy Black, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 7, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. See F & Rs, ECF No. 5. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendation that petitioner’s habeas petition should be dismissed based on Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). See F & Rs at 3. The court also agrees with the magistrate judge’s recommendation…