FCI-Herlong

(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20252:24-cv-01191California2,228 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CEDRIGUEZ MCCAA 2:24-cv-1191-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER FCI-HERLONG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Cedriguez McCaa, a federal prisoner, proceeds without counsel and requests to proceed in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). For screening purposes, the complaint states a claim against Dr. Allred under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), based on allegations of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs. No other claims are stated. Plaintiff may proceed on the deliberate indifference claim or plaintiff may file an amended complaint under the guidelines set forth below. I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s declaration in support of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion is granted. By separate order, plaintiff will 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.