(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20252:24-cv-01823California3,904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOVE, Case No. 2:24-CV-1823-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS TRI COUNTIES BANK, Defendant. (ECF No. 5) 16 Plaintiff Mary Love is proceeding in this action pro se. (ECF No. 1.)1 Pending before the Court is Defendant Tri Counties Bank’s2 motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends GRANTING Defendant’s motion to dismiss without leave to amend. / / / / / / / / / / / /

26 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and Local Rule 302(c). Defendant Tri Counties Bank’s name in incorrectly spelled in the Complaint as “Tri- Counties Bank.” See ECF No. 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the docket to reflect the correct spelling of Defendant Tri Counties Bank’s name. I. BACKGROUND A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.