Navarro-Zuniga

United States v. Navarro-Zuniga

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-1448California948 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1448 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:19-mj-23353-WVG-BTM-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

ARTURO NAVARRO-ZUNIGA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Arturo Navarro-Zuniga appeals his misdemeanor conviction for attempted

illegal entry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. He argues that

the magistrate judge erred in denying his motions to suppress his confessions. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.