Ryan Oneal v. Stephen Roberts
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RYAN ONEAL,
No. 23-15429 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01732-SPL-MTM v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEPHEN ROBERTS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 6, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Ryan Oneal, appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Sergeant Stephen Roberts. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review grants of summary judgment de
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). novo. See Donell v. Kowell, 533 F.3d 762, 769 (9th Cir. 2008) (citation omitted).
For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.