Kamlesh Banga v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance Agency

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202522-16957California1,078 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAMLESH BANGA, No. 22-16957

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01072-MCE-AC v.

AMERIPRISE AUTO & HOME MEMORANDUM*

INSURANCE AGENCY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Kamlesh Banga appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees, as well as the district court’s denial

of Banga’s motion for sanctions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.