Perez-Perez

Perez-Perez v. Bondi

Good Law
127 F.4th 1180
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-4240California1,263 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sanchez, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS ALBERTO PEREZ- No. 23-4240

PEREZ; M.E.P.-B.; AURY

Agency Nos.

FABIOLA BARRERA-

A220-454-951

GODOY; M.N.P.-B.,

A220-454-952

A220-939-540

Petitioners,

A220-939-541

v.

OPINION

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 3, 2025 * San Francisco, California Filed February 10, 2025

Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Danielle J. Forrest, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Sanchez

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). PEREZ-PEREZ V. BONDI

SUMMARY **

Immigration/FRAP 15(a)(2)(A)

Declining the government’s request to amend the case caption in a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that the lead petitioner’s wife and two minor children were sufficiently identified by their agency “A” numbers to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15(a)(2)(A)’s requirement to name each party seeking review either in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.