Haley Olson v. County of Grant

Good Law
127 F.4th 1193
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202523-35365California5,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HALEY OLSON, No. 23-35365

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01342-IM v.

COUNTY OF GRANT, a government OPINION entity; GLENN PALMER; JIM

CARPENTER,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

ABIGAIL MOBLEY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Filed February 10, 2025 Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Richard R. Clifton, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge McKeown; Concurrence by Judge Bress

SUMMARY *

Fourth Amendment/Qualified Immunity

The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment for law enforcement officials based on qualified immunity and lack of supervisory liability in Haley Olson’s action alleging Fourth Amendment violations arising from the extraction of the contents of her phone without a warrant. Olson was arrested in Idaho for marijuana possession and signed a form giving Idaho police consent to search her phone, who then created an “extraction,” or copy, of her phone contents.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.